The Role of Instruction and Student Involvement in the Manifestation of Graduate Attributes in the Workplace

Submitted: October 5, 2024 | Published: December 27, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.63130/hijcre.v1i1.107

Authors

Keywords:

Catholic Higher Education Institution, formation program, Graduate Attributes, Philosophy, Vision - Mission, Objectives (PVMO), Volunteer Groups

Abstract

Research indicates that developing graduate attributes is crucial for maintaining high educational standards. Universities have sought to prioritize and develop these attributes in their students. However, studies have also shown that there is often a gap between the knowledge graduates acquire and their ability to apply it in practice consistently (Arteaga, et al. 2024; LeHeron & Sligo 2005). The call to consistently live out the graduate attributes anchored on the institution’s philosophy, vision, mission, and objectives beyond academic years is paramount. In this study, a sequential explanatory mixed-method research design was employed. Quantitative data was collected to assess the extent to which graduates have learned the necessary skills and attributes from their education and whether they can apply them in their workplace. After this, qualitative data was collected to validate the results. The study indicated that two specific variables, the instruction through spiritual life formation and involvement in volunteer groups manifested through the orientation to serve, enabled graduates to adapt the graduate attributes and thrive in the workplace. By strengthening the link between graduate attributes and practical application, the university can embark on a new journey to prepare graduates for a fulfilling future.

References

[1] Astin, A. W. (2014). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. In College student development and academic life (pp. 251-262). Routledge.

[2] Astorini, G. F.(2016). The Relationship Between Co-Curricular College

Experiences and Students Moral Development.

[3] Barrie, S. C. (2006). Understanding what we mean by the generic attributes of

graduates. Higher education, 51(2), 215-241.

[4] Barrie, S. C. (2007). A conceptual framework for the teaching and learning of generic graduate attributes. Studies in higher education, 32(4), 439–458.

[5] Barrie, S. C. (2012). A research-based approach to generic graduate attributes policy. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(1), 79–92.

[6] Bozalek, V. (2013). Equity and graduate attributes. Human development and capabilities: Re-imagining the university of the twenty-first century, 69-81.

[7] Bridgstock, R. (2009). We have overlooked graduate attributes: Enhancing graduate employability through career management skills. Higher Education Research & Development, 28(1), 31-44.

[8] Brown, S. (2007). A Critique of Generic Learning Outcomes. Journal of Learning Design, 2(2), 22–30.

[9] Darling-Hammond, L., & Falk, B. (2013). Teacher Learning Through Assessment: How Student-Performance Assessments Can Support Teacher Learning Center. Center for American Progress.

[10] Donaldson, L. (2008). Toward integrating catholic social teaching into graduate social work education. JOURNAL of CATHOLIC HIGHER EDUCATION, 27(1), 33–49. https://veritas.journals.villanova.edu/index.php/jche/article/download/659/578

[11] Donleavy, G. (2012). Proclaimed graduate attributes of Australian universities: patterns, problems, and prospects. Quality Assurance in Education, 20(4), 341–356.

[12] Ex Corde Ecclesiae. Second Vatican Council. Retrieved from https://www.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/apost_constitutions/documents/hf_jp-ii_apc_15081990_ex-corde-ecclesiae.html

[13] Francis (2017). Nostalgia for One’s Roots. Morning meditation in the Chapel of the Domus Sanctae Marthae, October 5, 2017

[14] Green, W., Hammer, S., & Star, C. (2009). Facing the challenge: Why is it so hard to develop graduate attributes? Higher Education Research & Development, 28(1), 17–29.

[15] Halim, A. (2015) BUILDING RAPPORT CREATES EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION IN THE CLASSROOM. In PROCEEDING CONFERENCE ON APPLIED LINGUISTICS 8 (p. 5).

[16] Hammer, S., & Green, W. (2006). Working on work skills. The Australian (Higher Education Review), pp. 29–29.

[17] Harun, H., Salleh, R., Baharom, M. N. R., & Memon, M. A. (2017). Employability Skills and Attributes of Engineering and Technology Graduates from Employers’ Perspective: Important vs. Satisfaction. Global Business & Management Research, 9.

[18] Hill, J., Walkington, H., & France, D. (2016). Graduate attributes: implications for higher education practice and policy: Introduction. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 40(2), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2016.1154932

[19] Hughes, C., & Barrie, S. (2010). Influences on the assessment of graduate attributes in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(3), 325–334.

[20] Ismail, S. (2017). Graduate employability capacities, self-esteem and career adaptability among South African young adults. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 43(1), 1–10.

[21] Jones, A. (2009). Generic attributes as espoused theory: The importance of context. Higher Education, 58(2), 175–191.

[22] Kezar, A., and Dee, J.R, (2011). Conducting Multi-Paradigm inquiry in the Higher Education Organization and Governance study: Transforming Research Perspectives on College and UnIversities. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research: Volume (26). 265-315.

[23] Krebbs, M. J. (2013). Values infusion: A systematic response to Catholic identity. Journal of Catholic Education, 3(3), 4.

[24] Llenares, I. I., & Deocaris, C. C. (2019). Volunteerism Is Associated with Improved Soft Skills of Marine Engineering Students in the Philippines. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Education, 8(2), 57-73.

[25] Madrigal, D. V. (2015). Responding to the Challenges Of Employment Through Graduate Attributes. Recoletos Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.32871/rmrj1503.01.10

[26] Magulod Jr, G. C., Capulso, L. B., Dasig, J. P., Baluyot, M. B. B., Nisperos, J. N. S., Reyes-Chua, E., ... & Chupradit, S. (2020). Attainment of the immediate program graduate attributes and learning outcomes of teacher candidates towards global competence initiatives. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(12), 106-125.

[27] Moalosi, R., Molokwane, S., & Mothibedi, G. (2012). Using a Design-orientated Project to Attain Graduate Attributes. Design and Technology Education, 17(1), 30-43.

[28] Nicol, D. (2010). The foundation for graduate attributes: Developing self-regulation through self and peer assessment. The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. Scotland.

[29] Oliver, B. (2011). Assuring graduate outcomes. The Australian Learning and Teaching Council. Retrieved May 26, 2012.

[30] Osborne, M. (2017). The future of skills: Education and training for a changing world. Oxford University Press.

[31] Pope Paul VI. (1965, October 28). Gravissimum educationis. Www. The Vatican. Va. https://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_decl_19651028_gravissimum-educationis_en.html

[32] Parys, J. (2015). Service Learning and LEAP. Increasing Respect for Diversity through Campus-Community Collaboration in Advanced Spanish Courses. Journal of Community Engagement and Scholarship, 8(1), 106

[33] Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How College Affects Students: A Third Decade of Research. Volume 2. Jossey-Bass, An Imprint of Wiley. 10475 Crosspoint Blvd, Indianapolis, IN 46256.

[34] Sandri, O., Holdsworth, S., & Thomas, I. (2018). Assessing graduate sustainability capability post-degree completion: Why is it important, and what are the challenges? International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 19(1), 2–14.

[35] Sandri, O., Holdsworth, S., & Thomas, I. (2018). Vignette question design for the assessment of graduate sustainability learning outcomes. Environmental Education Research, 24(3), 406–426.

[36] Singleton, J. (2015). Head, heart and hands model for transformative learning: Place as context for changing sustainability values. Journal of Sustainability Education, pp. 9, 1–16.

[37] Smith, L., Martin, H., Hardison, L & Bird, J (2007). Community Campus Partnerships for Health. Faculty Toolkit for Service-Learning in Higher Education. Scotts Valley, CA: National Service-Learning Clearinghouse.

[38] Thomas, I., Barth, M., & Day, T. (2013). Education for sustainability, graduate capabilities, professional employment: How they connect. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 29(1), 33–51.

[39] Treleaven, L., & Voola, R. (2008). Integrating the development of graduate attributes through constructive alignment. Journal of marketing education, 30(2), 160–173.

[40] University of San Jose- Recoletos, Manual for the Academic Professionals (2023). Retrieved from https://edp.usjr.edu.ph/employee/view_ap_manual

Downloads

PlumX Metrics

PlumX Metrics

Citations

Cited by: —
View on Crossref

Published

12/27/2024

How to Cite

The Role of Instruction and Student Involvement in the Manifestation of Graduate Attributes in the Workplace. (2024). Hitik: International Journal of Catechists and Religious Educators, 1(1), 34-47. https://doi.org/10.63130/hijcre.v1i1.107