The Church of the Poor in the Second Plenary Council of the Philippines (PCP II): Its Concrete Expression in Basic Ecclesial Communities

Authors

Keywords:

Basic Ecclesial Communities (BECs), Church of the Poor, Ecclesiology, Inculturation, Lay Participation, Renewed Integral Evangelization, Second Plenary Council of the Philippines (PCP II)

Abstract

This study examines the vision of the “Church of the Poor” as articulated in the Second Plenary Council of the Philippines (1992) and its concrete expression through Basic Ecclesial Communities (BECs) in the Philippine context. Grounded in the enduring realities of poverty and inequality, the paper situates the Church’s mission within the broader call to justice, solidarity, and integral human development. It draws theological foundations from the Second Vatican Council (1962-1965), particularly its vision of a renewed, participatory, and mission-oriented Church, alongside the principle of the preferential option for the poor. Employing a theological and critical interpretive approach, the study explores the nature, structure, and mission of Basic Ecclesial Communities (BECs), grassroots communities characterized by communion, participation, and mission. It argues that Basic Ecclesial Communities (BECs) embody a participatory ecclesiology in which the poor are not merely recipients but active agents of evangelization and social transformation. Central to this dynamic is Renewed Integral Evangelization, which integrates catechesis, liturgical life, and social apostolate, fostering both personal conversion and communal renewal. The study concludes that Basic Ecclesial Communities (BECs) provide a vital and transformative model for realizing the Church of the Poor in the Philippines. By promoting lay participation, inculturation, and a socially engaged faith, Basic Ecclesial Communities (BECs) serve as concrete expressions of ecclesial renewal, despite ongoing challenges in implementation across diverse local contexts.

About the Author/s

Maria Lourdes S. Antonio

Maria Lourdes S. Antonio is an assistant professor at the University of Santo Tomas Institute of Religion. She holds a bachelor’s degree in Religious Education from the University of Santo Tomas-College of Education and a Master’s degree in Theology from the CICM Maryhill School of Theology. She is currently pursuing her doctorate at the UST Graduate School. She teaches specialization courses, including Ecclesiology, Articles of Faith, Retreat and Recollection, and Instructional Materials in Religious Education. Her research interests focus on ecclesiology, catholic social teachings, spirituality, and religious education and pedagogy.

Fred Jr. F. Antonio

Fred F. Antonio, Jr. is a college instructor at the University of Santo Tomas Institute of Religion, where he teaches Theology courses. He earned both his Bachelor’s degree in Philosophy and his Master’s degree in Religious Studies from Saint Louis University in Baguio. He is pursuing his doctorate at the UST Graduate School. Driven by a deep interest in how faith intersects with local culture, his academic research primarily focuses on inculturation, mariology, popular piety, and religiosity.

References

[1] Basas, A. (2019). Refiguring the Ecclesiology of the Second Plenary Council of the Philippines for Filipino Catholics. Philippiniana Sacra, 54 (161), 3–22. https://philsacra.ust.edu.ph/admin/downloadarticle?id=CD4F8B562E851311805390146541C4F4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55997/ps1001liv161a1

[2] Azevedo, M. D. C. (1985). Basic ecclesial communities: A meeting point of ecclesiologies. Theological Studies, 46(4), 597–620. https://doi.org/10.1177/004056398504600401 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/004056398504600401

[3] Bausch, W. (2000). The parish of the next millennium. Twenty-Third Publications.

[4] Boff, L. (1992). Good news to the poor: A new evangelization (R. Barr, Trans.). Orbis Books.

[5] Catholic Bishops’ Conference of the Philippines. (1984). The bond of love in proclaiming the Good News. In The Philippine bishops speak 1968–1983 (p. 145). Maryhill School of Theology.

[6] Dagmang, F. D. (2016). Basic ecclesial communities: An evaluation of the implementation of the acts and decrees of the Second Plenary Council of the Philippines in ten parishes in the Philippines. Manila.

[7] Dulles, A. (1981). Fundamental theology and the dynamics of conversion. The Thomist, 45(2), 175–193. https://doi.org/10.1353/THO.1981.0025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/tho.1981.0025

[8] Evans, C. (2002). The Church and the churches: Toward an ecumenical ecclesiology. Cambridge University Press.

[9] Federation of Asian Bishops’ Conferences. (1977). Asian colloquium on ministries in the Church (nos. 11–13).

[10] Federation of Asian Bishops’ Conferences. (1989, April). Becoming the Church of the poor with industrial workers(FABC Paper No. 52).

[11] Federation of Asian Bishops’ Conferences. (1992). Message of the conference. In G. Rosales & C. Arevalo (Eds.), For all the peoples of Asia (pp. 5–6). Orbis Books.

[12] Federation of Asian Bishops’ Conferences. (1997). Being Church in Asia: Journeying with the Spirit into fuller life. In F.-J. Eilers (Ed.), For all peoples of Asia (Vol. 2). Claretian Publications.

[13] Federation of Asian Bishops’ Conferences. (1999, April). Discovering the face of Jesus in Asia today: A guide to doing mission in Asia (FABC Paper No. 84). https://fabc.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/FABC-Papers-84.pdf

[14] Federation of Asian Bishops’ Conferences. (2000, October). Methodology: Asian Christian theology, doing theology in Asia today (FABC Paper No. 96). https://fabc.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/FABC-Papers-96.pdf

[15] Federation of Asian Bishops’ Conferences. (2017, March). The Catholic family in Asia: Domestic Church of the poor on a mission of mercy (FABC Paper No. 151). https://fabc.org/document/fabc-papers-151/

[16] Gabriel, M. (2008). Doing theology: Basic ecclesial communities, a new way of being Church. Anvil Publishing, Inc.

[17] Gomez, F. (2013). Vatican II at fifty: Moral and social teachings. UST Publishing House.

[18] Gutiérrez, L. M. (1990). Working with women of color: An empowerment perspective. Social Work, 35(2), 149–153. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/35.2.149 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/35.2.149

[19] Holden, W. (2009). Postmodern public administration in the land of promise: The Basic Ecclesial Community movement of Mindanao. Worldviews, 13(2), 180–210. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853509X438599 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156853509X438599

[20] Ilo, S. C. (2014). The church of the poor: Towards an ecclesiology of vulnerable mission. Ecclesiology, 10(2), 229-250. https://doi.org/10.1163/17455316-01002006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/17455316-01002006

[21] Jamison, R., Torres , R. OMI, & Rhudy, M, OND (2024). The Role of Church Activities in Sustaining Basic Ecclesial Community (B.E.C.) at the Archdiocesan Shrine of Sto. Niño Parish: A Case Study,’’ International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Publications, 6(12), 61–64. https://ijmrap.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/IJMRAP-V6N11P135Y24.pdf

[22] John Paul II. (1988, December 20). Christifideles Laici. Post-Synodal Apostolic Exhortation on The Vocation and the Mission of the Lay Faithful in the Church and in the World. http://w2.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/apost_exhortations/documents/hf_jp-ii_exh_30121988_christifideles-laici.html

[23] John Paul II. (1990). Redemptoris missio [Encyclical letter]. Vatican. https://www.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_07121990_redemptoris-missio.html

[24] John Paul II. (1987). Sollicitudo rei socialis [Encyclical letter]. https://www.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_30121987_sollicitudo-rei-socialis.html

[25] Kroeger, J. H. (2003). Local church, dialogue and conversion. FABC Papers, No. 107. https://fabc.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/FABC-Papers-107.pdf

[26] Lagarejos, A. (1999). The Church of the poor: A new perspective on the Church, the state, and the poor. Educational Resources Development Center.

[27] Maggay, M. (2008). To respond to human need by loving service. In A. Walls & C. Ross (Eds.), Exploring the five marks of global mission (pp. 57–67). Orbis Books.

[28] Mutia, F. Jr, Magno, A. & Mutia, D. (2023). Basic Ecclesial Community: Home of Synodality. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 7(8), 1287-1297. https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2023.7899 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2023.7899

[29] Ndzi, L. (2025). The Church as an Agent of Change: Alleviating Poverty Among its Members. Greener Journal of Social Sciences, 15(1), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.15580/gjss.2025.1.012825015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15580/gjss.2025.1.012825015

[30] Paul VI. (1965, December 7). Presbyterorum Ordinis. Decree on the Ministry and Life of Priests. www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_decree_19651207_presbyterorum-ordinis_en.html.

[31] Paul VI. (1967). Populorum progressio [Encyclical letter]. Vatican. https://www.vatican.va/content/paul-vi/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-vi_enc_26031967_populorum.html

[32] Paul VI. (1975). Evangelii nuntiandi [Apostolic exhortation]. Vatican. https://www.vatican.va/content/paul-vi/en/apost_exhortations/documents/hf_p-vi_exh_19751208_evangelii-nuntiandi.html

[33] Picardal, A. (2008). “BECs as Catalysts for Social Transformation.” In CBCP. Creating a Culture of Sustainability for Basic Ecclesial Communities. Intramuros, Manila: BEC Desk.

[34] Philippine Statistics Authority. (2024, July 22). Percentage of Filipino Families Classified as Poor Declined to 10.9 percent in 2023. https://psa.gov.ph/content/percentage-filipino-families-classified-poor-declined-109-percent-2023.

[35] Pope, S. J. (1993). Proper and improper partiality and the preferential option for the poor. Theological Studies, 54(2), 242–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040563993054002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/004056399305400203

[36] Power, D. (1980). Gifts that differ: Lay ministries established and unestablished. Pueblo Publishing Company.

[37] Romero, O. (1985). Voice of the voiceless: The four pastoral letters and other statements (M. J. Walsh, Trans.)

[38] Ryłko, S. (2011, June 25). The new evangelization: A question of being and doing. Pontifical Council for the Laity.

[39] Schillebeeckx, E. (1986). Ministry: Leadership in the community of Jesus Christ. Crossroad.

[40] Second General Conference of Latin American Bishops. (1968). The Medellín conference documents.

[41] Second Plenary Council of the Philippines. (1991). Acts and decrees of the Second Plenary Council of the Philippines. Catholic Bishops’ Conference of the Philippines.

[42] Second Vatican Council. (1962–1965). Documents of the Second Vatican Council. https://www.vatican.va

[43] Second Vatican Council. (1965). Gaudium et spes (Pastoral constitution on the Church in the modern world). Vatican. https://www.vatican.va

[44] Simon, B. (1990). Rethinking empowerment. Journal of Progressive Human Services, 1(1), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1300/J059v01n01_04 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J059v01n01_04

[45] Sullivan, F. A. (1988). The Church we believe in: One, holy, catholic, and apostolic. Paulist Press.

[46] Sullivan, F.A. (1997). Authority in an Ecclesiology of Communion. New Theology Review, 10(3), pp. 18–30. https://newtheologyreview.org/index_php/ntr/article/view/562

[47] Tagle, L. A. (2000). Renewal that awaits the Church in Asia (FABC Paper No. 91).

[48] Tutor, J., & Gambong, C. (2023). gift of faith: Tracing the 500 years of Christianity in the Philippines through the transformative experiences of the BEC lay leaders. Bedan Research Journal, 8(1), 229–258. https://doi.org/10.58870/berj.v8i1.53 DOI: https://doi.org/10.58870/berj.v8i1.53

Downloads

Download PDF

Views: 0
PDF Downloads: 0

PlumX Metrics

Citations

Cited by:
View on Crossref

Published

06/30/2026

How to Cite

Antonio, M. L., & Antonio, F. J. (2026). The Church of the Poor in the Second Plenary Council of the Philippines (PCP II): Its Concrete Expression in Basic Ecclesial Communities. Hitik: International Journal of Catechists and Religious Educators, 3(1), 174-190. https://doi.org/10.63130/hijcre.v3i1.237